Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[jurica2901]

I have inseam of 80 cm and 174 cm.I war 32 inches pants and after lenghtening I would have 84 cm of inseam.Is it acceptable inseam for 178 cm height?

[AimHigh]

Are you measuring crotch (Taint) to floor? - my inseam(Crotch to floor) is currently 84 cm (was 76 cm), my height 179 cm - some women call me tall, none say I have long legs, if i were You i would lengthen 6 cm to 180 cm with 86 cm inseam..

[jurica2901]

Yeah and I have one cm space in 32 inches pants.Pants are 81 cm and that minus one cm is 80 cm.I have long head thats why I seem like I have longer legs than usual.And when measured from crotch to floor it always shows 80 or sometimes 81 cm so I dont know.

[Thorfinnn]

I don’t think anyone would notice when your clothed. Maybe when your nked or wearing booty shorts it might look long, but long legs are considered more attractive.

[AimHigh]

actually 84 cm inseam at 178 cm is below optimal leg length - please see my previous post :-

"The "Hip" is not easy to identify exactly, from crotch to floor (against wall, push book up between legs to max, then measure top of book to floor is easiest) or even from greater Trochanter to floor...
The best study (2018 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.171790) on Leg/Body ratio used Trochanter to Ankle height vs Height to gauge Male attractiveness, using this method it found 1 SD above average i.e 0.490+>0.015 = .505 equals best L/H ratio - i.e for me @ 179 cm tall a 90 cm Leg (Trochanter to Bottom of ankle Medial Malleoulus) is most attrractive.
I am currently at 86 cm Leg length, this is after 8cm of LL, and give me a respectable .480 L/H ratio, I was  previously at an unattractive 78/171 = 0.455 L/H ratio..."