Limb Lengthening Forum
Community Hangout => Off Topic => Topic started by: PrettyTall on November 06, 2014, 09:54:28 AM
-
Oke girls ans guys 5'9 vs 5'11 one is an athlete the other is an actor but the height difference is there I personally would lik to get to 175cm with and be capable to lift and have a good shape so I go with average , he is the living proof that if you are average and in a good shape ain't no one goind to speak your height no ? waht are you thinking ?
Rich http://games.crossfit.com/athlete/11435
a troll picture ;D http://www.crossfitmagna.com/.a/6a0147e164cdcf970b019aff5aab20970b-800wi
-
I don't get what are you trying to say :D
But if you have trouble choosing between 5'9 and 5'11, The closer you are to your starting height the better (unless you have disproportionately short legs, Which is unlikely) .
-
I personally would lik to get to 175cm with and be capable to lift and have a good shape so I go with average , he is the living proof that if you are average and in a good shape ain't no one goind to speak your height no ? waht are you thinking ?
At 5'7-6'4, no one will comment about your height. It's only when you're below 5'6 or above 6'4 when people start to notice height and receive mainly negative comments.
175cm is a good height and at that height you should not encounter much problems!
-
dumb topic, women don't value strength as much as u do, ofc they don't want a weakling but choosing a guy based on their strength is just dumb
-
dumb topic, women don't value strength as much as u do, ofc they don't want a weakling but choosing a guy based on their strength is just dumb
Lots of Women love weaklings; look at how they freaked out over Brad Pitt in fight club.
-
dumb topic, women don't value strength as much as u do, ofc they don't want a weakling but choosing a guy based on their strength is just dumb
are you a girl ?
-
Lots of Women love weaklings; look at how they freaked out over Brad Pitt in fight club.
proves even more my point
-
What do you mean?
-
that strength isn't that important when it comes to attractivness, which isn't as many of u guys think that women prefer taller men because he's better in a fight
-
that strength isn't that important when it comes to attractivness, which isn't as many of u guys think that women prefer taller men because he's better in a fight
The reason women likes tall men is because it looks better aesthetically, and it looks more dominant. I mean there is a reason why animals like bears stand on their hind legs when they are trying to intimidate enemies, to look taller/bigger.
-
I don't really understand the OP but Ryan Gosling is 184CM according to this source:
http://www.celebheights.com/s/Ryan-Gosling-589.html
If you can't figure out which height to go for maybe make a compromise and try for 5'10?
-
The reason women likes tall men is because it looks better aesthetically, and it looks more dominant. I mean there is a reason why animals like bears stand on their hind legs when they are trying to intimidate enemies, to look taller/bigger.
What is better aesthically about tall men? And who cares what "looks dominant"? I'd be game to fight a man ten inches taller than me, because I know that I'm almost certainly stronger than him.
-
Women care about dominance they are extremely attracted to men with dominant traits like height, broad shoulders and confidence. Haven't you ever heard the cliché of the silent strong man?
-
What is better aesthically about tall men? And who cares what "looks dominant"? I'd be game to fight a man ten inches taller than me, because I know that I'm almost certainly stronger than him.
Don't be stupid, Accept it and move on.
Everything is wired this way.
www.youtube.com/embed/zr0f7W9QLZ4"
-
It's why Arnold Schwarzenegger would always be rated better than Franco Columbu in bodybuilding competitions despite Columbu being much stronger than Arnold in every possible way. He looked better aesthetically carrying all that muscle on a 6'2 frame than Columbu did with his 5'5 frame.
-
It's why Arnold Schwarzenegger would always be rated better than Franco Columbu in bodybuilding competitions despite Columbu being much stronger than Arnold in every possible way. He looked better aesthetically carrying all that muscle on a 6'2 frame than Columbu did with his 5'5 frame.
How so, though? I think Columbu looked better. Arnold is, and always hams been, overrated.
-
Accept what? What evidence do you have for your bull beliefs?