Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Sorcerer]

1.Some insanly tall countries haven't got memberships into the table,like Serbia,Montenegro,South Sudan,Crotia,Senegal and other countries.
So the rank was fked up and falsely positioned every country upwards.
2.The word 'Quotation' invovled in the original paper is warning you against that this statistic is just conjecture,not realistic measurements.It's ridiculous to imagine a medical team will more volunteer to seek for every corner to manipulate measurements on their own for random countries.What a horrendous project it is and it's a meaningless project or just aimming for people's quarrels about who is taller than who.
And they have even done a nice job to estimate North Korean average height is around 174.7cm barefoot LOOOOL.
3.Lancet journals are riddled with untenable and controversial conclusions if you have knew the palse of what Lancet is and stop perceiving that just bc it's a world-famous medical corp,it's the embediment of God.Authority can't triumph reality.If you don't believe me,go for NCBI and fill out the blank with 'upper and lower body ratio',you'll know every author is 'Leonardo Da Vinci'.
4.The more indigent a country is,the less rigorous measurements are,and it's same with towns and places.At least,America and Japan tend to publish medical data annually but developing countries tend to publish them periodically and undeveloped countries tend to seldom publish them!
Due to communicational unconveniences,human resources,solid occupational philosophy shortages and so on,we can't hardly reason why undeveloped and developing countries are causal about height measurements and for instance,I'm studying in a civilian-supported fking uni,and during the military drill,all of the collegemates are compelled into the medical and everyone stood up to a ultrasonic measurers with shoes and thicker haircuts than me,also we have to be awared that measurers can count your hair thicks into the measurements and your skull angel will impact on the final results as well,so they are not relible at all.
The more undeveloped a place is,the more skeptical local average height statistics tend to be,generally speaking.

What's more,this thread is more relevant to height.Were you satisfied,Matt Murdock?

[Siegfried]

Can you please put in a hiatus from your posting streak.

[Sorcerer]

How Chinese personnels are allocating measurements to students:





By random I collected several photographs manifesting the distorted phenomenon that some of Chinese personnels are measuring  students' heights with shoes on and even ultrasonic measurers,which can count in hair thicks.

But to be fair,here are some decent allocations:
http://jiangsu.sina.com.cn/news/2014-10-23/detail-iavxeafr4196046.crapml
The main theme of this news was building up the legitimacy of National Student Medicals,with too narrow static calibers though.
The news addressed 'Female senior students were compelled to be nked except being pantsless and they are feeling awkward,complaining about this horrible medical institution to parents.'

So,there are virtual increments of average height due to casual measurements involved in some samples,what's more,as the digital technology evolves,i think digital stadiometers and ultrasonic measurers will become more and more prevalant in the near future.

[Sorcerer]

Denmark is casual about measuring methods even in their lung function value assessments:

https://ugeskriftet.dk/files/scientific_article_files/2018-12/a4376.pdf

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We measured the stature of 87 subjects using a digital-counter stadiometer and a wallmounted bench rule. Stature was also estimated based on finger-reach measurement, and self-reported stature was recorded. R

[Sorcerer]

We gotta live up to Oxford restricts for outliers,here is Oxford medical examination handbook and they seem to apply digital stadiometers for college student height measurements:

https://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780199593972.001.0001/med-9780199593972-chapter-3

[Sorcerer]

Mexicans were carrying out Body Mass Index calculations with a collection of self-reported anthroposomatological statistics:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33721292/

Methods: In this secondary data analysis of a Mexican-American cohort, we collected self-reported PA, alcohol consumption, and demographics, and measured height and weight.

[Sorcerer]

Japs,the colony most enchanted with the importance of height,since they have ever been tormented by craning their podgy necks to Caucasians' faces,they can't still take responsibilities for accurate height measurements:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34470978/

Methods: We conducted the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study, a prospective study of 99,067 Japanese (41,730 men and 57,337 women) aged 40-79 years old. Height was self-reported, and the participants were followed up from 1988-1989 to the end of 2009.

[Sorcerer]

So,the examples I mentioned above were to prove how rigorous Anthropometric statistics are and we can reason that Lancet has collected false original data from every medical,mucinipal,town,school and institutes and so on.
So there must be certain virtual increments in the average height data,and in addition to sole quotations but not actual Anthropometric measurements in every country,we can conclude Lancet demographics are unrelible for various reasons.

[Sorcerer]

If my time permits,I'll substantially reveal the imbecile soul implicit in its body and address the real data.

But my time only permits me into reviews before my postponed final exams so my condition can't fulfill my ambitions.
I hope everyone can see through Lancet's irresponsibilities and imprecisions concerning height stastistics,although I'm not hyped for anyone trusting its errors simply bc its authority.

Albert Einstein moralized anything willing to manifest his authority is gonna be defeated by realities in the end.

Aristotle addressed have a passion for the person of the truth while having no in danger love the truth,at in danger love the truth more.

Copernicus was presecuted for his realistic theories by incineration due to religion authorities in middle-age Europe.

Also,many indigenous scholars from other countries apart from the England were participating in this estimation so there are only chances that national average heights were only exggerated and filtered for ulterior motions.Some insanly tall countries couldn't dispatch scholars into the Lancet due to indigences so the average height rank of both males and females was fked up.
But I dunno if the immanent interventions bc of international competitions among all of overseas scholars had impacts on estimations so I guess that's why fking North Korea average height was fabricated as 174.7cm barefoot.
I guess Kim Jong-un dispatched a primary student to do the Maths in the Lancet medical group or just other North-Korea-friendly bastards commited the crime.

[Sorcerer]

Today I learned something from <the human centipede 2>,a horror movie with a lead actor of fatty 156cm barefoot tall tumor-headed dwarfism who is obsessed with the human centipede and also suffers from intelligent retardation and asthma spousing with his distorted mental conditions.
Now we can assume the dwarfism is height,we human is the human centipede played trickeries by him and we can't have no alternatives but to eat each other's feces and urines.We can compare feces and urines to our competitions over heights and appearances,struggling for them without any natal arsenals and requisites and after insistences and intransigences,we found no other ways but to do LL to get rid of interpersonal anatomic connections.We are not the human centipede any more then.