Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.  (Read 12325 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ReadRothbard

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1735
Re: Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.
« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2015, 10:36:21 PM »
Quote from: Outgrown on February 02, 2015, 10:10:59 PM
Stronger than you buff

More muscular than me?
Logged
“If you're afraid - don't do it, - if you're doing it - don't be afraid!” ― Genghis Khan

172 cm in the morning (67.8"); 170 cm (67”) at night; Sitting Height: 96 cm (37.8”); Goal: 184.5 cm (6'0.7"); Ultimate Goal: 192 cm (6’3.5) morning height, 190 cm (6’3) “night” height
Future space tycoon

Outgrown

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 196
  • "Long enough to touch the ground" -Abraham Lincoln
Re: Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.
« Reply #32 on: February 02, 2015, 10:47:04 PM »
Logged
5"6 and proud

Puertoricanwasp123

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 298
Re: Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.
« Reply #33 on: February 03, 2015, 12:44:41 AM »
Where I live there is no single woman who is buff.
Logged

ReadRothbard

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1735
Re: Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.
« Reply #34 on: February 03, 2015, 04:35:22 PM »
Logged
“If you're afraid - don't do it, - if you're doing it - don't be afraid!” ― Genghis Khan

172 cm in the morning (67.8"); 170 cm (67”) at night; Sitting Height: 96 cm (37.8”); Goal: 184.5 cm (6'0.7"); Ultimate Goal: 192 cm (6’3.5) morning height, 190 cm (6’3) “night” height
Future space tycoon

Uppland

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1562
Re: Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.
« Reply #35 on: February 03, 2015, 05:25:46 PM »
Quote from: KiloKAHN on February 02, 2015, 09:23:13 AM
When I was in China a few years ago I found that a lot of the hot girls that could afford to be picky wanted guys who were 5'9 and above. I landed a lot of women though at 5'5 who didn't care about my height and just thought it would be cool to date a western guy.

Just out of curiosity: how tall would 5'9 be in western standards?

i.e if 175CM is sort of a golden limit in China, what is the euro/american equivalent?
Logged

Moubgf

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 504
Re: Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.
« Reply #36 on: February 03, 2015, 08:57:17 PM »
Quote from: Uppland on February 03, 2015, 05:25:46 PM
Just out of curiosity: how tall would 5'9 be in western standards?

i.e if 175CM is sort of a golden limit in China, what is the euro/american equivalent?

5'10
Logged

ReadRothbard

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1735
Re: Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.
« Reply #37 on: February 03, 2015, 09:01:22 PM »
Quote from: Slim_tim on February 03, 2015, 08:57:17 PM
5'10

Since 5'7 (170.2 cm) is average for men in China, and since two inches above average is 5'9, the American equivalent would probably be 5'11.5-6'0.
Logged
“If you're afraid - don't do it, - if you're doing it - don't be afraid!” ― Genghis Khan

172 cm in the morning (67.8"); 170 cm (67”) at night; Sitting Height: 96 cm (37.8”); Goal: 184.5 cm (6'0.7"); Ultimate Goal: 192 cm (6’3.5) morning height, 190 cm (6’3) “night” height
Future space tycoon
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »