Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: TSF Frames vs Ilizarov  (Read 277 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 566
  • 5'9
TSF Frames vs Ilizarov
« on: August 06, 2020, 12:28:49 AM »
Hello,

I've got a question, do we have to keep the TSF frames whole the procedure til the bone gets consolidated? Is the amount of waiting same as ilizarov?

Best Regards
Logged
height: 174-5 at night
wingspan: 180+

precice strider

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 185
Re: TSF Frames vs Ilizarov
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2020, 12:49:04 AM »
TSFs and Ilizarovs serve the same purpose, so I would think the waiting time is the same.

For LON and LATN, the external fixator is taken off after the end of lengthening, but for a purely external procedure the external fixator stays on until after consolidation.
Logged
Height dysphoria since 2008. (age 5)
Hoping to undergo STRYDE 8cm femurs when I can afford it.
164 cm with a wingspan of 166cm
Goal: 5'7.5 (172+) or taller, but hopefully 5'8 (173)
https://www.instagram.com/precice_strider/

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 566
  • 5'9
Re: TSF Frames vs Ilizarov
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2020, 12:52:36 AM »
Thanks for the answer.

Do you think going with TSF would be better than LON on tibias?
(as long term effects)
Logged
height: 174-5 at night
wingspan: 180+

Medium Drink Of Water

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3587
Re: TSF Frames vs Ilizarov
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2020, 01:41:59 AM »
You can do LON with TSF.

TSF is just a more technologically advanced version of the older Ilizarov fixator.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »