Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method  (Read 475 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« on: September 13, 2020, 07:37:33 AM »

Tyler from NHG website has been modifying his LSJL method. He was doing something a little bit different from conventional LSJL method when he managed to grow.

http://www.naturalheightgrowth.com/2020/08/29/new-lsjl-paper-update-revising-lsjl-method/
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."

O_99

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 149
Logged
Looking for an alternative.

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."

Strike_Poseidon

  • Visitor
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2020, 12:54:07 PM »

the people on this forum are very ignorant and just don't want to listen to new ideas. WAKE UP EVERYONE! THERE ARE MORE WAYS TO GROW THAN LL SURGERIES via distraction osteogenesis or PRECICE NAIL
Logged

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2020, 01:08:18 PM »

the people on this forum are very ignorant and just don't want to listen to new ideas. WAKE UP EVERYONE! THERE ARE MORE WAYS TO GROW THAN LL SURGERIES via distraction osteogenesis or PRECICE NAIL

I can use your help to enlighten these people.
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."

Skyisthelimit

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 101
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2020, 01:29:13 PM »

I can use your help to enlighten these people.
Try it out and let us know, buddy. Currently, these are just hypotheses. So if you would like to enlighten us, go through the procedure and update us with results. Maybe this way we’ll pay more attention to other alternatives.
Logged

Body Builder

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1257
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2020, 01:34:09 PM »

the people on this forum are very ignorant and just don't want to listen to new ideas. WAKE UP EVERYONE! THERE ARE MORE WAYS TO GROW THAN LL SURGERIES via distraction osteogenesis or PRECICE NAIL
Really?

Tell me one proven method for a permanent height gain except from LL. Because as far as I know there is not any !
Logged

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2020, 01:34:58 PM »

Try it out and let us know, buddy. Currently, these are just hypotheses. So if you would like to enlighten us, go through the procedure and update us with results. Maybe this way we’ll pay more attention to other alternatives.

If I try it and succeed alone, I will probably just disappear to enjoy life and make a lot of money out of my new discovery.
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."

O_99

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 149
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2020, 02:20:54 PM »

the people on this forum are very ignorant and just don't want to listen to new ideas.

You don't say!

Although, since I joined the forum, about a month ago, I feel a slight shift of interest for LLS alternatives, and that's a good thing.
But maybe it's just my perception, idk.

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/lsjl/modified-lsjl-update-method-t1032.html
Logged
Looking for an alternative.

ghkid2019

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 639
  • Height neurosis is a shítty thing.
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #9 on: September 20, 2020, 09:23:07 AM »

Tyler's been running that site for 10 years lol. Dude gained a inch. Saids it all lol. If I clamp my bones like a crack addict for 10 years fk yeah I bet I would also get an inch looool. I bet if I pulled my penis for 10 years straight I'd be surprised if I DIDNT get a few inches hue hue hue

Saids alot about this guy. 10 years. 1000 articles. One inch.


Loooooooool total game changer
Logged
You don't need others approval to do what YOU KNOW is necessary to live a fulfilling life.

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #10 on: September 20, 2020, 09:48:26 AM »

Tyler's been running that site for 10 years lol. Dude gained a inch. Saids it all lol. If I clamp my bones like a crack addict for 10 years fk yeah I bet I would also get an inch looool. I bet if I pulled my penis for 10 years straight I'd be surprised if I DIDNT get a few inches hue hue hue

Saids alot about this guy. 10 years. 1000 articles. One inch.


Loooooooool total game changer

First, that 1" comes from 2 years of doing a specific excercise.

Second, 10 years of excercising for 1" doesn't sound so bad compared to breaking your bones and life-threathening surgery with lifelong permanent side effects for 2".

Well that is if that 1" is legit. For now we don't know if it is.
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."

levsfri

  • Visitor
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2020, 02:09:46 PM »

Tyler's been running that site for 10 years lol. Dude gained a inch. Saids it all lol. If I clamp my bones like a crack addict for 10 years fk yeah I bet I would also get an inch looool. I bet if I pulled my penis for 10 years straight I'd be surprised if I DIDNT get a few inches hue hue hue

Saids alot about this guy. 10 years. 1000 articles. One inch.


Loooooooool total game changer

I wouldn't actually mind doing it if there was a quicker way like 2-3 years, if it was actually an inch of course but I have not read into lsjl  too much before he wrote that update as it seemed useless and just a waste of time

First, that 1" comes from 2 years of doing a specific excercise.

Second, 10 years of excercising for 1" doesn't sound so bad compared to breaking your bones and life-threathening surgery with lifelong permanent side effects for 2".

Well that is if that 1" is legit. For now we don't know if it is.

He said he went from 5'7 to 5'8 but starting he might have been like 5'7.5 or something, he should have given his height in cm. Reminds me of those stupid bonesmash theories
Logged

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2020, 02:53:01 PM »

I wouldn't actually mind doing it if there was a quicker way like 2-3 years, if it was actually an inch of course but I have not read into lsjl  too much before he wrote that update as it seemed useless and just a waste of time

He said he went from 5'7 to 5'8 but starting he might have been like 5'7.5 or something, he should have given his height in cm. Reminds me of those stupid bonesmash theories

Yes, it's all just an anecdotal evidence so far. As I said I don't know if that claim is legit and I don't fully believe it.

But if we could really gain an inch of just clamping our bones daily, then that would definitely be a game changer.

1" is not something to undermine when you are short.
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."

Body Builder

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1257
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2020, 03:32:55 PM »

Yes, it's all just an anecdotal evidence so far. As I said I don't know if that claim is legit and I don't fully believe it.

But if we could really gain an inch of just clamping our bones daily, then that would definitely be a game changer.

1" is not something to undermine when you are short.
1 inch, especially if you are very short (1.65 and less) make no difference.
I would never have tried anything to achieve just 1 inch. Furthermore when that is an anecdotal bs which need years to be done.
So trying for years something completely insane to gain 1 inch instead of focusing on how to fund LL with a good doctor is the most stupid thing ever.

Anyway, I am out of all these conversations. I thought we are in an LL forum, not somewhere where we post trash made to scam people.
Logged

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 486
  • 5'8 1/2
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #14 on: September 20, 2020, 05:02:23 PM »

Agreed BB.

If you are 5'7 and wanna hit 5'8, that would be good. Because 5'8 pretty much ilusional. People don't think you are "that short" when you pass 5'7 mark. Other than that, I'd not waste my time. Unless it was a 2 inch gain.
Logged
height: 173
wingspan: 180+

O_99

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 149
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #15 on: September 22, 2020, 06:07:07 PM »

Most 'Stryders' pay 50k-100k+ $ and have 2 surgeries (one to break their legs + rods in; one to take the rods out) and go through fking pain for 2-3 inches.

So if you could gain 1 inch with LSJL, it's ~35% of the 3 inch height gain Sryder and 50% of the 2 inch height gain Stryder.

Talk about 1 inch makes no difference now.

1 inch would be huge. HUGE. The problem is that this joint loading method most likely doesn't do sh*t. We need to focus on other alternatives.
Logged
Looking for an alternative.

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 486
  • 5'8 1/2
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #16 on: September 22, 2020, 06:17:43 PM »

I think LSJL method is corrupt and would not work on everyone. If you are lucky, yes.
Logged
height: 173
wingspan: 180+

O_99

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 149
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2020, 06:20:31 PM »

I think LSJL method is corrupt and would not work on everyone. If you are lucky, yes.

If you could do it 'correctly' as an adult with fused growth plates, it would work. We don't know if it works at all.
Logged
Looking for an alternative.

ZUCC420

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 221
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #18 on: September 22, 2020, 06:25:27 PM »

Sounds like those d!ck "jelqing" exercises where everyone on the dedicated peepee augmenting forum says it works because otherwise why would they be "exercising" their d!ck for 4-8 years. Then after being challenged they say you'd have to at the very least try for 2 years to see any results at all. All of them quite effectively reassures themselves by citing each other as sources of anecdotal proofs, reinforcing the chimera while never once objectively measuring and posting pictures of their d!cks for others to verify.
Logged
A man can do what he wants, but not want what he wants. - Arthur Schopenhauer

Body Builder

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1257
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #19 on: September 22, 2020, 07:13:55 PM »

Most 'Stryders' pay 50k-100k+ $ and have 2 surgeries (one to break their legs + rods in; one to take the rods out) and go through fking pain for 2-3 inches.
If you find any other alternative except from LL to get taller permanently, please inform me.
So if you could gain 1 inch with LSJL, it's ~35% of the 3 inch height gain Sryder and 50% of the 2 inch height gain Stryder.

Talk about 1 inch makes no difference now.

1 inch would be huge. HUGE. The problem is that this joint loading method most likely doesn't do sh*t. We need to focus on other alternatives.
Logged

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #20 on: September 22, 2020, 07:27:54 PM »

Sounds like those d!ck "jelqing" exercises where everyone on the dedicated peepee augmenting forum says it works because otherwise why would they be "exercising" their d!ck for 4-8 years. Then after being challenged they say you'd have to at the very least try for 2 years to see any results at all. All of them quite effectively reassures themselves by citing each other as sources of anecdotal proofs, reinforcing the chimera while never once objectively measuring and posting pictures of their d!cks for others to verify.

Actually, I was about to start "jelqing" a month ago, but then too lazy and haven't started till now.

Gotta start today or tomorrow.
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."

Scarface

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 126
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2020, 07:33:00 PM »

Jelqing is cope. Traction devices are legit.
Logged

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2020, 07:37:21 PM »

Jelqing is cope. Traction devices are legit.

You mean stretcher? If I am not mistaken jelqing is more for thickness while stretcher are more for length. But the best would be to incorporate both.

But either way, they aren't really comparable. These dck excercises have strong evidence. LSJL is in an experimental phase.
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."

ZUCC420

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 221
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2020, 10:26:13 PM »

You mean stretcher? If I am not mistaken jelqing is more for thickness while stretcher are more for length. But the best would be to incorporate both.

But either way, they aren't really comparable. These dck excercises have strong evidence. LSJL is in an experimental phase.

What kind of "strong evidence" for jelqing? Scientifically documented ones or broscience self-reference ones? At least studies have been done on traction devices.
Logged
A man can do what he wants, but not want what he wants. - Arthur Schopenhauer

O_99

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 149
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #24 on: September 23, 2020, 07:13:52 AM »

If you find any other alternative except from LL to get taller permanently, please inform me.

I might.
The point is, 1 inch would make a significant difference.
Logged
Looking for an alternative.

ghkid2019

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 639
  • Height neurosis is a shítty thing.
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #25 on: September 23, 2020, 09:43:24 AM »

Gimme 1 inch daddy ty daddy (ooh harder) we Stan "el ess jay el"

Love from mumbai
Logged
You don't need others approval to do what YOU KNOW is necessary to live a fulfilling life.

Bruce Wayne

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 836
Re: New LSJL paper and update on revising LSJL method
« Reply #26 on: September 23, 2020, 10:14:31 PM »

What kind of "strong evidence" for jelqing? Scientifically documented ones or broscience self-reference ones? At least studies have been done on traction devices.

I was referring to D excercises in general actually because I remembered reading studies on it somewhere. But you're right, seems that traction is the only one that has studies so far.
Logged


"You either accept that your life was ruined by stunted growth or you continue living your bluepilled coping manlet life."
Pages: [1]   Go Up