Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Monorails vs circular frame for tibias  (Read 1764 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cannibal

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52
Monorails vs circular frame for tibias
« on: September 08, 2014, 05:28:16 PM »

I like the look of the monorails a lot better than the circular frame and was thinking of using them on my tibias. Do you think there are any downsides to using the monorail on tibias as opposed to the circular frame? Monorails seem like they're so much more comfortable and less barbaric.
Logged
A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti.

Greek-Semidget

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 168
Re: Monorails vs circular frame for tibias
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2014, 05:38:12 PM »

they are actually not so stable and hard to weightbear, if you don't have money for internals, go to dr bagirov Russia or better dr Salameh Frankfurt, both devices weightbear, pure external but salamehfix has half rings ;)
Logged
Current height 5'8 Future height: 5'11 . 3 inch gain tibias in Russia.

Medium Drink Of Water

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3587
Re: Monorails vs circular frame for tibias
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2014, 05:44:20 PM »

Monorails get the job done.  People have successfully lengthened their legs with monorails.  Don't worry too much about which device you use.
Logged

crimsontide

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1160
Re: Monorails vs circular frame for tibias
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2014, 05:46:23 PM »




the bagirov frame is too small, and will be very uncomfortable
Logged

Greek-Semidget

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 168
Re: Monorails vs circular frame for tibias
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2014, 05:47:51 PM »



the bagirov frame is too small, and will be very uncomfortable
I guess that depends on how thick your legs are, or not?
Logged
Current height 5'8 Future height: 5'11 . 3 inch gain tibias in Russia.

KiloKAHN

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2280
  • Digital Devil
Re: Monorails vs circular frame for tibias
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2014, 05:52:30 PM »

Dr Parihar told me that larger patients tend to get valgus (x-legs) when lengthening tibias with monorails. It's also easier to get equinus with them.
Logged
Initial height: 164 cm / ~5'5" (Surgery on 6/25/2014)
Current height: 170 cm / 5'7" (Frames removed 6/29/2015)
External Tibia lengthening performed by Dr Mangal Parihar in Mumbai, India.
My Cosmetic Leg Lengthening Experience

GeTs

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 737
Re: Monorails vs circular frame for tibias
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2014, 06:19:30 PM »

There is a reason why ilizarov used a large circular frame
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up