Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Inseam masurements  (Read 335 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alamin

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 113
Inseam masurements
« on: August 14, 2020, 05:18:20 PM »

Do u guys think a 90 cm inseam at 181 cm height is too much....and that too including 178cm wingspan.
Logged

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 487
  • 5'8 1/2
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2020, 03:23:32 PM »

Well, as this post has been talked about before, I have given an example to the related users. I'll also give that example to you.


https://www.imgmodels.com/albertreed1/milan/men/portfolio LOOK AT THE TOP LEFT, THERE'S AN ICON BELOW THE "MEN" TEXT. Click on it to see the models' measurements.
This guy is 188cm and has an inseam of 84cm.

https://www.imgmodels.com/joelmeack/milan/men/portfolio
This guy is 188cm and has an inseam of 86 cm.

https://www.imgmodels.com/dylanfender/milan/men/portfolio
This guy is 188cm and has an inseam of 81 cm.

So yeah, 90 cm will be too much.
Logged
height: 173
wingspan: 180+

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 487
  • 5'8 1/2
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2020, 03:26:36 PM »

Also, how the hell is your inseam too much? If I get lengthened +12 cms, I wouldn't even hit 90cm inseam.
Logged
height: 173
wingspan: 180+

short

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 200
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2020, 04:53:38 PM »

90/181 = 0.497
It's in the longleg range but OK.

Average inseam to height ratio, men:

- above 180cm = 0.48 to 0.50
- between 170cm and 180cm  = 0.46 to 0.48
- below 170cm = 0.44 to 0.46

Men on average have a ratio of 0.478
Logged

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 487
  • 5'8 1/2
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2020, 05:10:54 PM »

Lol? So that model with 81 inseam has a ratio of 0.43085106383

the other one has 0.45

the other one has 0.44
 They all are disproportionate then!
Logged
height: 173
wingspan: 180+

short

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 200
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2020, 05:13:01 PM »

They aren't, but it's more common for taller people to have higher inseam/height-ratio than shorter ones.

Also limbs and torso grow alternately and not at the same time. Depending on when/in which phase growth stops people are short or long-legged.

There is a military-study that shows that men in WW2 (~173cm) had the same torso size than men today in the army but 7cm shorter legs.


AND don't forget in the fashion industry pants length is often used as inseam length which isn't the same we are using for inseam/height-ratio!!!
« Last Edit: September 03, 2020, 05:42:04 PM by short »
Logged

Tartar

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2020, 07:46:13 PM »

The model measurements are PANTS INSEAM! It’s way different! It’s a lower number.
The TRUE inseam is measured from pelvis (behind the balls, pushing a book quite hard) to the floor.
The normal range is from 0,42 to 0,50. What “short” told is right, taller people generally has longer limbs and so and higher inseam/height ratio.
Every model I’ve seen has quite long limbs, according to the beauty standards of the fashion world.
True inseam is a measurement often used by the bikers, it’s needed to calculate the right bike that fit you.
Logged

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 487
  • 5'8 1/2
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2020, 07:50:52 PM »

Don't consider me as stupid but I've always thought when the scientific papers about body ratios mentioned "inseam length", I've always considered it as the "pant inseam length".

Logged
height: 173
wingspan: 180+

Tartar

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2020, 08:10:46 PM »

Don't consider me as stupid but I've always thought when the scientific papers about body ratios mentioned "inseam length", I've always considered it as the "pant inseam length".


I think they always talk about true inseam because it’s definitely more precise. Anyway you can just check if the ratio looks reasonable or not. If you check in bikes forums you can find many topics about inseam with hundreds of measurement of the true inseam.
0,43 is a low number, as common as a 0,50 ratio. I don’t think there are many models so short legged lol
Logged

a

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 487
  • 5'8 1/2
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #9 on: September 03, 2020, 08:21:38 PM »

The thing I don't get is, what measurement do they exactly use in leg to body ratio? It should not be the true inseam, because you would be missing the upper part of your legs such as your butt.
Logged
height: 173
wingspan: 180+

Alamin

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 113
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2020, 09:06:15 PM »

Hey dude a.....what you are thinking about is leg length not inseam..inseam and leg length are diff. Things.
Logged

Alamin

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 113
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2020, 09:34:16 PM »

Inseam length gives quiet a knowlegdge about how long your legs are
Logged

short

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 200
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2020, 09:59:40 PM »

What's the problem? The pelvic bone belongs to the torso. So measuring from pelvis to floor is a fixed number. Btw when you know your inseam and your height, you know your sitting height.

Both inseam and height are the easiest to measure and therefore most accurate.
Sitting height for example sucks to measure and depends on body-fat/muscle index.

So just measure your inseam and your height and calculate the ratio. Everything between 0.42 and 0.50 is normal.
Logged

Tartar

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
Re: Inseam masurements
« Reply #13 on: September 04, 2020, 10:04:44 AM »

What's the problem? The pelvic bone belongs to the torso. So measuring from pelvis to floor is a fixed number. Btw when you know your inseam and your height, you know your sitting height.

Both inseam and height are the easiest to measure and therefore most accurate.
Sitting height for example sucks to measure and depends on body-fat/muscle index.

So just measure your inseam and your height and calculate the ratio. Everything between 0.42 and 0.50 is normal.

Absolutely agree
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up